Lawler spearheads effort to reimburse Matassa legal fees: $230,000

Moose Pearce’s (and Matassa’s) new favorite Councilman Aaron Lawler (at right)

On March 21 Ascension’s Council emerged from Executive Session having discussed Agenda Item; Parish of Ascension v Berkley Insurance Company, written demand (Legal Counsel).  Berkley Insurance is the parish’s Public Entity provider in return for a $236,450 annual premium.  While none of the Council participants is talking, the closed door session was to authorize outside legal counsel ($100,000 more of your tax dollars) to pursue reimbursement of President Kenny Matassa’s legal fees ($235,000) paid to his private criminal defense attorney.

Matassa and his attorney (file photo)

Reconvening after its secret session, Chairwoman Teri Casso recognized Councilman Aaron Lawler in a scripted action.

“I’d like to make a motion to authorize our legal counsel to take all legal actions necessary to pursue any and all claims, um, arising out of, uh, an insurance (inaudible stammer) about any insurance claims related to the discussion in the executive committee,” Lawler wended his way through an inartfully crafted motion.

Councilman John Cagnolatti dutifully seconded and there was no objection.  It was not the first time Lawler took the lead for Matassa (keep reading).

According to a member of his administration Matassa’s attention turned to reimbursement of the fees, incurred to defend a felony bribery charge, as soon as he was acquitted on July 11, 2018.  Lobbying various members of the Parish Council to reimburse those fees, appropriation can only be done by ordinance, Matassa never could cobble together the requisite six votes.

In October an opinion was sought from Terrebonne’s District Attorney who, applying state law, confirmed the Council’s discretionary authority to reimburse Matassa if certain conditions were satisfied.  According to Louisiana’s Legislative Auditor, “There are no statutory provisions which require indemnification to local Government officials; however, the majority of AG opinions (See AG Op. Nos. 11-0182 and 15-0019) state that a local government entity may, but is not required to, reimburse an official or employee for legal expenses if:

  • the charges against the individual arose out of his operating within the “course and scope” of his employment; and
  • he is exonerated of all charges.”

Unscientific Pelican Poll

It would be political suicide to reimburse Matassa’s fees though, we suspect, several of the 11-member body would like to do so.  As 2018 drew to a close Matassa’s private lawyer and Parish Legal Counsel O’Neil Parenton began looking for an alternative source of funding.   Enter Councilman Aaron Lawler.

Pelican Post obtained the following email from Lawler to Council’s leadership, Chairwoman Teri Casso and Vice-Chairman Benny Johnson, on January 26:

“I have been thinking about this.  Yes, I know this scares y’all.  I think there is some information we need before we can go forward with an agenda item.  If it does get on the agenda I will make a motion to table the item and I have several people that will second the motion.  Below is a short list of questions/items I would like before we have to make a decision on this.

1. Do we have public official liability coverage? If so, what is the deductible and the limits?
2. Was our agent notified to place the public official liability carrier on notice? Who placed the agent on notice? How and when was the agent put on notice? How and when did the agent put the carrier on notice?
3. Who was the adjuster assigned to this claim?
4. If an insurance carrier is denying coverage, have we received a letter of declination? Please produce a copy of the letter. If a letter of declination was received why wasn’t the council notified of this? Who received the letter of declination?
5. If we have received a letter of declination, have we notified the agent’s errors and omissions carrier of a potential claim?
Is the parish contemplating suit against its insurance agent on behalf of Kenny Matassa?

“It is up to y’all how do you want to proceed with these questions and present them to the administration.  I did not want to rock the boat and do it myself without y’all knowing what was going on.  I will be happy to take the lead on this, just let me know. 

Lawler, an insurance defense lawyer himself, is uniquely suited to pursue Matassa’s interests.

When the Council convened Executive Session on March 21 it was accompanied into antechamber by Tim Hardy, an attorney with Roedel Parsons.  Which explains a subsequent email thread between Councilman John Cagnolatti and Chairwoman Casso.  It began with Cagnolatti’s February 1 query to the administration:

“What, specifically is the purpose of ammending (sic) the contract with Roedel Parsons by 100%?  Sandra did not elaborate in her email.”  (Sandra is Sandra Perera of the Finance Department).

Cagnolatti was referred to the Council Chair.  On February 3 he wrote:

“Hi Teri, Please see the email stream below and the attachments.  Are you familiar with this contract?  Can you answer my question…?

Casso’s reply:

“I can only assume this is relative to Kenny’s legal fees and perhaps Taleta?  My goal for your meeting would be to determine who, what, why, and how much?”

Unsurprisingly, Cagnolatti went along.  Back in 2017 he caught a lot of flak from power brokers inside the City of Gonzales for a “No Confidence” vote in Matassa.  The two served on the City Council together from 2009-12.

What meeting Casso was referring to is a mystery.  Cagnolatti chairs the Personnel Committee which would meet twice in February.  Neither of its agendas included an item related to the email thread.  Roedel Parson’s new contract did make it onto Chairman Bill Dawson’s February 12 agenda of Finance, though.

 (18) Amendment No. 1 to Legal Services Contract with Roedel Parsons Koch Blanche Balhoff & McCollister to include “Employment Law Services” in the scope of services. Compensation will be increased by $100,000.00 for a total Contract not to exceed amount of $200,000.00 (Ken Dawson, Chief Administrative Officer)

Pelican Post emailed a series of questions to each Council member on April 6.  None has provided any answers.

Comments

comments